the dictators ... will not wait for an act of war on our part. they did not wait for norway or belgium or…
the dictators ... will not wait for an act of war on our part. they did not wait for norway or belgium or the netherlands to commit an act of war. * 14 points\nappeal to logic (logos)\nappeal to emotion (pathos)\nappeal to authority (ethos)\n\neven when the world war broke out in 1914, it seemed to contain only small threat of danger to our own american future. * 14 points\nappeal to logic (logos)\nappeal to emotion (pathos)\nappeal to authority (ethos)
Answer
Brief Explanations:
- For the first statement: The speaker uses logical reasoning by pointing out that dictators did not wait for other countries (Norway, Belgium, Netherlands) to commit an act of war. This is a form of logical argument (Logos) as it presents a pattern of behavior (dictators' past actions) to make a claim about their future behavior.
- For the second statement: It is presenting a historical fact (World War in 1914) and its perceived threat to America. This is an appeal to logic (Logos) as it is using historical data (a form of logical evidence) to make a point about the nature of the threat at that time.
Answer:
First question: A. Appeal to Logic (Logos) Second question: A. Appeal to Logic (Logos)