lets focus on logos\nlogos is an appeal to logic; it is a means of convincing the audience through rational…

lets focus on logos\nlogos is an appeal to logic; it is a means of convincing the audience through rational thought and reason.\nhow can you incorporate logos?\n- you can use research and statistics to back - up your arguments. (87% of students benefit from textbooks, so...)\n- you can use logical processes to explain your point - if this, then that. (if you dont want gum disease, then you should brush regularly.)\n- you must give convincing, solid evidence and reasons to support your claims. (i need a car. it would make me more independent; save me money; improve my life.)\nwhy use logos? if you can present a logical, rational argument to your audience, which engages their intellect and sense of reason, they are more likely to be persuaded.\ntask one: for each of the following, explain whether or not you think that logos is being used effectively.\n\i need new jeans. everyone in my class has new jeans.\\n\all men and women will die. you are a man. therefore, you will die one day.\\n\everyone has children. therefore, everyone needs to think about the schooling of his or her children.\\n\you dont need to jump in front of a train to know its a bad idea; so why do you need to try drugs to know if theyre damaging?\\n\cigarette smoke contains over 4,800 chemicals, 69 of which are known to cause cancer. so why start smoking?\\n\every morning the rooster crows, then the sun rises. therefore the rooster causes the sun to rise.\\nin the scenarios, write your own persuasive sentences using logos:

lets focus on logos\nlogos is an appeal to logic; it is a means of convincing the audience through rational thought and reason.\nhow can you incorporate logos?\n- you can use research and statistics to back - up your arguments. (87% of students benefit from textbooks, so...)\n- you can use logical processes to explain your point - if this, then that. (if you dont want gum disease, then you should brush regularly.)\n- you must give convincing, solid evidence and reasons to support your claims. (i need a car. it would make me more independent; save me money; improve my life.)\nwhy use logos? if you can present a logical, rational argument to your audience, which engages their intellect and sense of reason, they are more likely to be persuaded.\ntask one: for each of the following, explain whether or not you think that logos is being used effectively.\n\i need new jeans. everyone in my class has new jeans.\\n\all men and women will die. you are a man. therefore, you will die one day.\\n\everyone has children. therefore, everyone needs to think about the schooling of his or her children.\\n\you dont need to jump in front of a train to know its a bad idea; so why do you need to try drugs to know if theyre damaging?\\n\cigarette smoke contains over 4,800 chemicals, 69 of which are known to cause cancer. so why start smoking?\\n\every morning the rooster crows, then the sun rises. therefore the rooster causes the sun to rise.\\nin the scenarios, write your own persuasive sentences using logos:

Answer

Brief Explanations:

  1. Explanation: This is a weak use of logos. Just because everyone in the class has new jeans is not a logical, rational reason for the speaker to need new jeans. It's more of a band - wagon fallacy rather than a sound logical argument.
  2. Explanation: This is a strong use of logos. It uses a general truth (all men and women will die) and applies it to an individual case (you are a man, so you will die), following a logical syllogism.
  3. Explanation: The first part about not needing to jump in front of a train to know it's bad is a valid logical comparison. However, the statement about drugs is a bit of a false - equivalence. But overall, it attempts to use logical reasoning to persuade against trying drugs.
  4. Explanation: This is a strong use of logos. It presents factual evidence (cigarette smoke contains many chemicals, 69 known to cause cancer) to persuade against starting smoking.
  5. Explanation: This is a fallacy, specifically a post - hoc ergo propter hoc fallacy. Just because the rooster crows before the sun rises doesn't mean the rooster causes the sun to rise. It's a false logical connection.

Answer:

  1. Weak use of logos.
  2. Strong use of logos.
  3. Moderate use of logos with some flaws.
  4. Strong use of logos.
  5. Weak use of logos (fallacy).