the norton field guide provides an explanation of how to approach your arguments claims. which of the…

the norton field guide provides an explanation of how to approach your arguments claims. which of the following is not a norton - stipulated explanation regarding a claim? a good arguments are based on arguable claims. b arguable claims can be verifiable statements of fact, matters of personal taste, or issues of faith or belief. c claims are the core part of your essays argument and thesis statement. d stronger arguments often qualify the claims, instead of simply arguing all for or against.

the norton field guide provides an explanation of how to approach your arguments claims. which of the following is not a norton - stipulated explanation regarding a claim? a good arguments are based on arguable claims. b arguable claims can be verifiable statements of fact, matters of personal taste, or issues of faith or belief. c claims are the core part of your essays argument and thesis statement. d stronger arguments often qualify the claims, instead of simply arguing all for or against.

Answer

Brief Explanations:

In argument - writing as per The Norton Field Guide, arguable claims should be statements that can be debated and are not matters of personal taste or faith/belief which are subjective and not verifiable in an objective sense for the purpose of an academic argument. Statements of fact can be part of an argument, but personal taste and faith - based statements are not typical arguable claims in the context of academic argumentation.

Answer:

B. Arguable claims can be verifiable statements of fact, matters of personal taste, or issues of faith or belief.