the norton field guide recommends avoiding fallacies (statements with faulty reasoning) when constructing an…

the norton field guide recommends avoiding fallacies (statements with faulty reasoning) when constructing an argument. which of the following is not a norton - stipulated fallacy that persuasive writers should avoid? a an argument that misrepresents opposing positions, making them so extreme or ridiculous that they are easier to refute. b an argument that analyzes a comprehensive, peer - reviewed study for its findings in relation to the authors thesis. c an argument that provides a false dilemma, as if there are only two possible positions on a complex issue. d an argument that attacks the character of a person rather than the argument or issue itself. e an argument that predicts how one event will lead to a devastating final outcome, despite lack of evidence supporting such a cause - effect scenario.

the norton field guide recommends avoiding fallacies (statements with faulty reasoning) when constructing an argument. which of the following is not a norton - stipulated fallacy that persuasive writers should avoid? a an argument that misrepresents opposing positions, making them so extreme or ridiculous that they are easier to refute. b an argument that analyzes a comprehensive, peer - reviewed study for its findings in relation to the authors thesis. c an argument that provides a false dilemma, as if there are only two possible positions on a complex issue. d an argument that attacks the character of a person rather than the argument or issue itself. e an argument that predicts how one event will lead to a devastating final outcome, despite lack of evidence supporting such a cause - effect scenario.

Answer

Brief Explanations:

A is a straw - man fallacy. C is a false - dilemma fallacy. D is an ad hominem fallacy. E is a slippery - slope fallacy. Analyzing a peer - reviewed study (B) is a valid research and argumentation method, not a fallacy.

Answer:

B. An argument that analyzes a comprehensive, peer - reviewed study for its findings in relation to the author's thesis.