peer revision: students were given the following prompt for a writing assignment. prompt: using the texts…

peer revision: students were given the following prompt for a writing assignment. prompt: using the texts provided, develop an expository essay explaining the contributions of the three women to the space program to a group of middle schoolers. ensure that your writing identifies the significance of their individual achievements and their impact on gender and racial equality in science and mathematics. read the students response below, then answer the questions provided in order to help this student improve their writing. student response: katherine johnson, dorothy vaughan, and mary jackson were important figures in the space program. they worked at nasa and were known as computers. katherine johnson did some math for john glenns mission, and she was really good at it. it was important for women to be in science, but there werent many. dorothy vaughan was a supervisor, and she helped her coworkers. mary jackson became an engineer, which was cool, but not many people knew about them until the movie came out. these women did their jobs, but it wasnt easy because of their race and gender. they fought for better treatment and more opportunities. the texts mention that african american women performing essential calculations for significant space missions. (common lit) which shows they were needed. in conclusion, these women made a difference in space exploration, but its hard to say how much they changed things for everyone else. their work is important, but it was just one part of the larger story of nasa. what suggestion would best help the writer address conflicting viewpoints in their conclusion? try ending with a question to make your conclusion more engaging. add more technical details about nasas missions to strengthen your ending. consider removing the conclusion since it repeats earlier points. you could clarify your conclusion by explaining why their contributions still matter today, even if they were just one part of nasas story.

peer revision: students were given the following prompt for a writing assignment. prompt: using the texts provided, develop an expository essay explaining the contributions of the three women to the space program to a group of middle schoolers. ensure that your writing identifies the significance of their individual achievements and their impact on gender and racial equality in science and mathematics. read the students response below, then answer the questions provided in order to help this student improve their writing. student response: katherine johnson, dorothy vaughan, and mary jackson were important figures in the space program. they worked at nasa and were known as computers. katherine johnson did some math for john glenns mission, and she was really good at it. it was important for women to be in science, but there werent many. dorothy vaughan was a supervisor, and she helped her coworkers. mary jackson became an engineer, which was cool, but not many people knew about them until the movie came out. these women did their jobs, but it wasnt easy because of their race and gender. they fought for better treatment and more opportunities. the texts mention that african american women performing essential calculations for significant space missions. (common lit) which shows they were needed. in conclusion, these women made a difference in space exploration, but its hard to say how much they changed things for everyone else. their work is important, but it was just one part of the larger story of nasa. what suggestion would best help the writer address conflicting viewpoints in their conclusion? try ending with a question to make your conclusion more engaging. add more technical details about nasas missions to strengthen your ending. consider removing the conclusion since it repeats earlier points. you could clarify your conclusion by explaining why their contributions still matter today, even if they were just one part of nasas story.

Answer

Brief Explanations:

The conclusion mentions the importance of the women's work but also its limited - scope within NASA's story. Explaining why their contributions still matter today would address this conflict by giving more context and significance to their achievements. Ending with a question doesn't directly address the conflicting viewpoints. Adding technical details about NASA's missions is off - topic for resolving the conflict in the conclusion about the women's contributions. Removing the conclusion is not a solution to addressing the conflict.

Answer:

"You could clarify your conclusion by explaining why their contributions still matter today, even if they were just one part of NASA's story."