practice analyze and evaluate how jacobs uses primary sources to add interest, clarity, and legitimacy to…

practice analyze and evaluate how jacobs uses primary sources to add interest, clarity, and legitimacy to the points she is making. for example, ask: “what does this quotation from a primary source do? does it make the point clearer?” work individually to gather your notes in this chart. then, share your observations with your group. dear abigail primary source information effect paragraph 1 paragraph 6 paragraph 10 paragraph 17

practice analyze and evaluate how jacobs uses primary sources to add interest, clarity, and legitimacy to the points she is making. for example, ask: “what does this quotation from a primary source do? does it make the point clearer?” work individually to gather your notes in this chart. then, share your observations with your group. dear abigail primary source information effect paragraph 1 paragraph 6 paragraph 10 paragraph 17

Answer

Brief Explanations:

To answer this, one would first identify the primary - source quotations in each paragraph (e.g., John's letters to Abigail are primary sources). Then, analyze how they add interest (by providing a personal, historical perspective), clarity (by giving direct statements about events and feelings), and legitimacy (as they are first - hand accounts). For example, John's letters about the state of affairs in Congress add a personal touch and directly convey the critical nature of the events, making the historical narrative more engaging and believable.

Answer:

For Paragraph 1:

  • Primary Source Information: John's letter to Abigail at the end of April.
  • Effect: Adds interest by showing personal correspondence during a historical time, gives clarity on the need for certain qualities during Congressional discord, and adds legitimacy as a first - hand account. For Paragraph 6:
  • Primary Source Information: John's letter to Abigail in the middle of June after Henry Lee's motion.
  • Effect: Adds interest with a metaphorical statement about the future, clarifies his positive view of the motion for separation, and adds legitimacy as a personal reaction from a historical figure. (As no content for Paragraph 10 and 17 is provided, full answers for them cannot be given. But the method would be the same for those paragraphs.)