regina is writing an argument against adding fluoride to the citys drinking water. which statement best…

regina is writing an argument against adding fluoride to the citys drinking water. which statement best introduces the topic?\no a. adding a known drug to our drinking water is not responsible, and a lot of people agree with me on this issue; even the food and drug administration has admitted that fluoride is a drug subject to regulation.\no b. because the food and drug administration has stated in 2000 that fluoride is a drug subject to regulation when it is \used in the diagnosis, cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of disease in man or animal,\ we would be pathetically misguided to put it in our water supply.\no c. even the food and drug administration would agree that we are flooded with toxins and chemicals; therefore, we should carefully consider the facts before adding more fluoride to our drinking water.\no d. the food and drug administration stated in 2000 that fluoride is a drug subject to regulation when it is \used in the diagnosis, cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of disease in man or animal\ and, therefore, deserves careful attention as we consider adding it to our water supply.
Answer
Brief Explanations:
Option D starts by citing the FDA's classification of fluoride as a regulated drug and then links it to the consideration of adding it to the water supply, introducing the topic clearly and objectively. Option A is more opinion - based and less objective in introduction. Option B is a bit convoluted in its structure. Option C is more about the general idea of toxins and less about introducing the specific topic of adding fluoride to water.
Answer:
D. The Food and Drug Administration stated in 2000 that fluoride is a drug subject to regulation when it is "used in the diagnosis, cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of disease in man or animal" and therefore, deserves careful attention as we consider adding it to our water supply.