3 ruby is considering whether or not she should add the following supporting details to the third…

3 ruby is considering whether or not she should add the following supporting details to the third - paragraph (sentences 16 - 20). additionally, if scientists genetically engineer babies still in the womb, there is a very real and present danger that this could lead to complications, including miscarriage (early on), premature birth or even stillbirth, all of which are unthinkable. these are just minor risks compared to the loss of entire populations by a significant gene mutation. where could ruby place these sentences? a after sentence 18 b after sentence 19 c after sentence 20 d ruby should not add these sentences to the paragraph. 4 ruby wants to add a more effective transition between the second paragraph (sentences 7 - 15) and the third paragraph (sentences 16 - 20). which of the following sentences should be added before sentence 16 to help the reader effectively transition from the second to the third paragraph? f the idea of editing human genes is relatively new but fascinating and possibly world changing science. g is it okay to “play god” and change a human’s genes and as a result the genes of future generations? h these new ideas are dangerous and obviously not worth the unknown risk that might be associated with such a change. j gene editing in human - related situations is a slippery slope that could lead to the eradication of society and virtually no genetic differences in the population. 5 what change, if any, needs to be made to sentence 24? a change have to had b delete the comma after centuries c change exist to existed d no change needs to be made to this sentence. created by custom classroom by angela copyright © 2019

3 ruby is considering whether or not she should add the following supporting details to the third - paragraph (sentences 16 - 20). additionally, if scientists genetically engineer babies still in the womb, there is a very real and present danger that this could lead to complications, including miscarriage (early on), premature birth or even stillbirth, all of which are unthinkable. these are just minor risks compared to the loss of entire populations by a significant gene mutation. where could ruby place these sentences? a after sentence 18 b after sentence 19 c after sentence 20 d ruby should not add these sentences to the paragraph. 4 ruby wants to add a more effective transition between the second paragraph (sentences 7 - 15) and the third paragraph (sentences 16 - 20). which of the following sentences should be added before sentence 16 to help the reader effectively transition from the second to the third paragraph? f the idea of editing human genes is relatively new but fascinating and possibly world changing science. g is it okay to “play god” and change a human’s genes and as a result the genes of future generations? h these new ideas are dangerous and obviously not worth the unknown risk that might be associated with such a change. j gene editing in human - related situations is a slippery slope that could lead to the eradication of society and virtually no genetic differences in the population. 5 what change, if any, needs to be made to sentence 24? a change have to had b delete the comma after centuries c change exist to existed d no change needs to be made to this sentence. created by custom classroom by angela copyright © 2019

Answer

Brief Explanations:

Question 3:

The additional details discuss risks of genetic - engineering of babies in the womb. Sentence 19 likely discusses related risks, so adding after it makes the most sense in terms of flow.

Question 4:

The second paragraph likely discusses gene - editing in general and the third paragraph focuses on its risks. Option G poses a thought - provoking question that bridges the two ideas well.

Question 5:

Without seeing sentence 24, it's hard to be certain, but if it's about something that has been ongoing for centuries and still exists, no change is likely needed.

Answer:

  1. B. After sentence 19
  2. G. Is it okay to “play god” and change a human's genes and as a result the genes of future generations?
  3. D. No change needs to be made to this sentence.