“a simple way to create suspense”\nhow do you create suspense? im asked that question often, and it seems…

“a simple way to create suspense”\nhow do you create suspense? im asked that question often, and it seems that every writers’ symposium has a class with that title. its an important technical issue, and not just for so - called suspense novels. every novel needs a narrative engine, a reason for people to keep reading to the end, whatever the subject, style, genre or approach.\nbut its a bad question. its very form misleads writers and pushes them onto an unhelpful and overcomplicated track.\nbecause “how do you create suspense?” has the same interrogatory shape as “how do you bake a cake?” and we all know—in theory or practice—how to bake a cake. we need ingredients, and we infer that the better quality those ingredients are, the better quality the cake will be. we know that we have to mix and stir those ingredients, and were led to believe that the more thoroughly and conscientiously we combine them, the better the cake will taste. we know we have to cook the cake in an oven, and we figure that the more exact the temperature and timing, the better the cake will look.\nso writers are taught to focus on ingredients and their combination. theyre told they should create attractive, sympathetic characters, so that readers will care about them deeply, and then to plunge those\nwhich note best summarizes the central idea of “a simple way to create suspense”?\ngood ingredients = good cake\nno remote control in 1980\nmake readers hungry for answers\nlee child - wrote books & television

“a simple way to create suspense”\nhow do you create suspense? im asked that question often, and it seems that every writers’ symposium has a class with that title. its an important technical issue, and not just for so - called suspense novels. every novel needs a narrative engine, a reason for people to keep reading to the end, whatever the subject, style, genre or approach.\nbut its a bad question. its very form misleads writers and pushes them onto an unhelpful and overcomplicated track.\nbecause “how do you create suspense?” has the same interrogatory shape as “how do you bake a cake?” and we all know—in theory or practice—how to bake a cake. we need ingredients, and we infer that the better quality those ingredients are, the better quality the cake will be. we know that we have to mix and stir those ingredients, and were led to believe that the more thoroughly and conscientiously we combine them, the better the cake will taste. we know we have to cook the cake in an oven, and we figure that the more exact the temperature and timing, the better the cake will look.\nso writers are taught to focus on ingredients and their combination. theyre told they should create attractive, sympathetic characters, so that readers will care about them deeply, and then to plunge those\nwhich note best summarizes the central idea of “a simple way to create suspense”?\ngood ingredients = good cake\nno remote control in 1980\nmake readers hungry for answers\nlee child - wrote books & television

Answer

Brief Explanations:

The text discusses creating suspense in writing. It emphasizes that every novel needs a reason to keep readers engaged. The idea of making readers eager for answers aligns with creating suspense. The other options are off - topic.

Answer:

Make readers hungry for answers