they stay, in essence, unchanged, and they would likely do so for a very long time. which sentence would be…

they stay, in essence, unchanged, and they would likely do so for a very long time. which sentence would be best to add to effectively point out the strengths and limitations of this claim? o a. the problem is that most people do not recognize the usefulness of these books, so they end up selling them or giving them away to those who do not have access to an e - reader. o b. if special care it taken, paper books can last for centuries, whereas electronic books might only last for 10 - 20 years because of their need to be updated from obsolete software or other technological requirements. o c. it is true that paper books are not entirely indestructible, and intentional damage or carelessness can greatly reduce the life of a book; however, even in those situations a lot of purpose must go into their destruction, even for the cheap variety. o d. paper books do fade over time, and some will wither away if they are exposed to the elements. on the other hand, e - readers are even more likely to be damaged from natural forces - a slight wind pushing a tablet onto the ground with a loud crash.

they stay, in essence, unchanged, and they would likely do so for a very long time. which sentence would be best to add to effectively point out the strengths and limitations of this claim? o a. the problem is that most people do not recognize the usefulness of these books, so they end up selling them or giving them away to those who do not have access to an e - reader. o b. if special care it taken, paper books can last for centuries, whereas electronic books might only last for 10 - 20 years because of their need to be updated from obsolete software or other technological requirements. o c. it is true that paper books are not entirely indestructible, and intentional damage or carelessness can greatly reduce the life of a book; however, even in those situations a lot of purpose must go into their destruction, even for the cheap variety. o d. paper books do fade over time, and some will wither away if they are exposed to the elements. on the other hand, e - readers are even more likely to be damaged from natural forces - a slight wind pushing a tablet onto the ground with a loud crash.

Answer

Brief Explanations:

We need to find a sentence that shows both strengths and limitations of the claim that paper - books stay unchanged for a long time. Option C mentions that paper books are not indestructible (limitation) but also that a lot of purposeful action is needed to destroy them (strength). Option A only mentions a problem with people's perception of paper books. Option B compares the lifespan of paper and e - books but doesn't focus on the indestructibility of paper books as the claim does. Option D only compares the vulnerability of paper books and e - readers to natural forces without highlighting the strengths of paper books.

Answer:

C. It is true that paper books are not entirely indestructible, and intentional damage or carelessness can greatly reduce the life of a book; however, even in those situations a lot of purpose must go into their destruction, even for the cheap variety.